A simple, easy-to-follow step-by-step guide on how to Start, Conduct and Translate research in childhood obesity for any clinician, novice researcher, clinician-researcher, professional staff or system decision-maker.
For every dollar spent in health and medical research, approximately $2.17 is returned in health benefits. The creation of knowledge through research activities underpins improvements in Australia’s health service delivery and intervention. Research activities attempt to create this knowledge through the systematic investigation of a topic, guided by research questions. This new knowledge then needs to be effectively translated into changes in clinical practice and policy to benefit the population of interest, in this case, children and adolescents who live with overweight and obesity and their families.
Who is leading?
Health and Wellbeing Queensland (HWQld) is Queensland’s first statutory body for health promotion. HWQld was established in July 2019 to improve the health and wellbeing of the population and reduce health inequities, with an initial focus on reducing the risk factors that drive the chronic disease burden, such as poor nutrition, physical activity and obesity.
HWQld delivers collaborative, action-based clinical and research leadership for paediatric overweight and obesity. HWQld host a team of dedicated clinicians and researchers who specialise in obesity prevention, treatment and research. If you would like guidance on research in paediatric overweight and obesity, or if you would like to partner with us, please contact: POHT.C@hw.qld.gov.au
Can I do research?
Research is a careful consideration of study regarding a particular concern or problem using scientific methods. The short answer is, yes! Research is everyone’s business. Anyone can do research, provided they have the right support, resources and tools. If you work in any capacity within a health service across Queensland, you can contribute to and lead research.
3 steps to starting research
Finding a gap
A research “gap” is simply an unanswered question in the research literature. A research gap is an area that is yet to be explored or hasn’t been explored thoroughly. Gaps can be related to any aspect of research, such as a specific population, research method, an intervention or innovation, types of data collected, data analysis methods or other conditions.
The first step to finding a gap is to conduct a literature review. You could do this by searching for journal articles, books or grey literature (reports, government documents, policy statements) in your area of interest. It may be useful to create a search strategy to help you. You may also be aware of gaps simply from practising as a clinician. It’s important to confirm your practice gap is a research gap by thoroughly searching for any existing evidence about your gap.
Research question, aims and hypothesis
A good research question is the foundation of all research. It clearly states the problem you are trying to solve, whether that be a knowledge or practice problem.
How and What statements are typically the most useful.
Two examples of good research questions related to childhood overweight and obesity are:
- How does consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in adolescents with overweight or obesity change after completing a 4-week health professional-led educational intervention?
- What are enablers and barriers for parents in completing an online prevention program for childhood overweight and obesity?
Build your team
Every team needs an experienced leader, especially a research team. An experienced research leader may hold a Honours or Masters degree, or a PhD, hold a Research Fellow or Officer position, be affiliated with a University and/or be an expert in research processes, such as ethics and governance. A strong research leader can help to guide you through the major and minor details of research, right from developing your research question and applying for ethical approval, to writing a journal article and translating your findings into practice.
It’s important to first identify what your research needs are and who is best placed to support these. Research needs may relate to:
- Expertise in paediatric obesity
- Equipment e.g. scales, stadiometer
- Partnership with other services or organisations, particularly leaders in tackling paediatric obesity
- Ability to search electronic databases for literature e.g. EMBASE, PUBMED, Web of Science
- Research assistance
- Ethical and governance approvals (see section below)
- Statistical support
- Translating your research into practice
- Publishing or presenting your research results
- Evaluating your research
Types of research and research studies
There are two main types of research – quantitative and qualitative. These types of research may be performed separately; however, in practice they are often combined (“mixed-methods”) to enhance the quality of research.
- Explores clearly defined, specific questions
- May test causalities or links between variables
- Data is numeric and measured continuously
- Data is categorical and measured at intervals10px
- Seeks to explain the “how” and “why” of a program, intervention, phenomenon or variable.
- May investigate knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, understanding, acceptance, feasibility, as examples
- Data is non-numeric and may encompass images, videos, text, written word and spoken word.
There are many different types of research studies and it’s important to choose the type that best answers your research question. Here are some examples:
Systematic literature review
“I want to summarise data from multiple different studies and evaluate their similarities, differences and results”
Systematic review guidelines: PRISMA
Using PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison Outcome) terminology to guide searching
How do I get funded?
Sources of funding are numerous and varied. Liaise with your local clinical service, University and philanthropic organisations (such as the Children’s Hospital Foundation, The Smith Foundation) to find out what grant or funding opportunities may be available to apply for. The Queensland Government Grants Finder is a good place to start.
Before applying for funding, it’s important to understand what exactly you might need funding for. Here are some typical funding considerations:
- Research staff, including:
- Research Leaders
- Postdoctoral Research Fellows
- PhD students
- Research Assistants
- Clinical staff
- Administration support
- Clinical trial manager
- Study equipment
- Software or other licence purchasing
- Participant reimbursement fees
- Publication fees
- General dissemination of study findings
- Digital development
- Access to population datasets or independent datasets
- Transcribing recorded interviews or focus groups
- Conference registration and attendance
- Website design and ongoing maintenance costs
Collaboration and partnership
Collaboration and partnership present opportunities to strengthen your research. Some strong partner organisations in Queensland for paediatric obesity are:
Benefits of research partnership include shared ownership, enhanced intellectual contribution, strengthening the team to apply for competitive research funding, access to equipment and infrastructure, wider participant reach and assistance in disseminating research findings (via Conferences or peer-reviewed publications).
Typically, the first step is to simply send an email. You may like to ask who is a research leader within each organisation. If you’re unsure, start by emailing POHT.C@hw.qld.gov.au. HWQld is a statewide leader in paediatric obesity and can help point you in the right direction. From there, it is important to liaise with your organisation’s partnerships, governance or legal team to determine what is legally and ethically required to engage in partnership.
Do I need ethical approval?
Yes – if you’re doing human research. Human research is research conducted with or about people, or their data or tissue. Participation in research involves taking part in surveys, interviews or focus groups, undergoing psychological, physiological or medical testing or treatment, undergoing observation by researchers, researchers having access to personal documents or other materials, the collection and use of body organs, tissues or fluids or access to information as part of an existing published or unpublished source or database.
The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research guides all research involving human participants.
For research involving children and young people, there are unique ethical concerns such as:
- Their capacity to understand the research
- Possible coercion to participate in the research by parents, peers or researchers
- Conflicting values and interests of parents and children
Other ethical concerns involving children and young people living with overweight or obesity include:
- Understanding weight stigma
- The discussion of weight and its potential impacts
- The physical and psychological complexities associated with living with overweight or obesity
What is a HREC?
A Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) reviews research proposals that involve human participants to ensure they comply with ethical standards. A HREC decides if it is ethical for you to conduct your proposed research. In Australia, these ethical standards are part of the National Health and Medical Research Council’s (NHMRC) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. It outlines the national standards for the ethical design, review and conduct of human research.
Ethical reviews by HREC’s are undertaken at various risk levels, depending on the degree of risk to human participants in your research, or if you are conducting research in priority populations, such as children and young people or Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
If you’re unsure, contact your local HREC to discuss your research proposal risk level and what is required to submit a research proposal for ethical review. Working closely alongside your respective HREC for the duration of your study allows for greater flexibility in the in the conduction of research and collection of research outcomes.
Research governance refers to the processes used to ensure that research is conducted in-line with ethical principles, guidelines for responsible research, legislation and local and institutional policy. Elements of research governance include:
- Ethical approval
- Compliance with legislation, regulations, guidelines and codes of practice
- Legal matters including contracts and insurance
- Financial management including site-specific assessments and allocation of funding
- Institutional policy and procedures for responsible research conduct
- Management of collaborative research, especially important for multi-site research
- Reporting requirements
If you’re unsure, contact your local Research Governance Office and Research Governance Officer. Your local HREC will be able to point you in the right direction.
What is a Site-Specific Assessment?
Public health organisations are required to conduct Site-Specific Assessment (SSA) of each research project to ensure that the organisation is a suitable site. This includes consideration of physical resources, staffing, insurance and indemnity requirements, and funding.
The SSA and HREC ethical review may occur at the same time, but decisions on SSA approval will only be made after the HREC has granted ethical approval. Each state or territory has a specific SSA form to be completed and submitted to the relevant research officer.
Research agreements are required for research with multiple partners, e.g. Universities, Research Organisations, private companies, or external health organisations. The agreement will outline the conditions of any collaboration for research, and the requirements of all parties in meeting their obligation in relation to the research project. The completion of this agreement is a collaboration between researchers and the governance officers, using the protocol and agreed processes to guide the details. A signed copy of the research agreement will be required to ensure approval of the SSA.
Writing a Research Protocol
A research protocol is essential to produce high quality research outcomes. Protocols generally follow a conventional layout outlining the following details of the project:
|Study title||Hypothesis||Study procedures|
|Investigators||Study design||Statistical considerations and data|
|Background||Study population||Ethical considerations|
|Aim||Participant eligibility criteria||Outcomes and significance|
The preparation of a protocol is important in the planning phase of a research project as:
It states the research question you aim to answer and how it will be answered
It encourages adequate consideration and planning of project details prior to commencement
It allows co-investigators to contribute to a dynamic document, including early review before completion
It acts as a record of the initial project aims and procedures, enabling the monitoring of project progress
It provides a basis for funding or human research ethics applications
The Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service research and education subsection provides a generic protocol template, aiming to offer medical, nursing, midwifery and allied health researchers a generic guide suitable for a broader range of clinical and scientific research enquiries.
Here is an example of a published research protocol in obesity in Australia.
Obtaining ethical consent
Participation in research is a choice made by an individual, parent, family or child. Consent is a requirement for all research involving human participants, under the conditions:
- Consent should be freely given
- Consent should be based on sufficient information and understanding of the research project and the implications of participating in it (informed consent)
- Consent is valid only for the purpose that the participant has agreed to
- Consent must be legally valid, and the person must have the capacity to do so.
A child or young person (age 0-17 years) cannot legally give consent on their own behalf to participate in research. A child or young person does have the ability to express their approval to participate or decide to withdraw from participation.
Children and young people should be asked if they wish to participate in the research.
It’s important to consider a child’s level of maturity and the complexity of the research when asking for their assent. An assent form can help provide information in a clear, understandable way for the child or young person.
It’s critical to gather data about the participants in your research to understand their background. Demographic data can help provide new insights into your research, and link and explain results. It can also help to understand if you have recruited your target population, and what sort of populations you might like to recruit next.
Demographic data to consider collecting that are relevant to paediatric obesity include:
Parental marital status
Parental smoking status
(as an indicator of socioeconomic status)
Outcome measures are directly related to your research question – what is it that you’re trying to determine, and what exactly do you need to measure to do this? Measuring outcomes is crucial to understanding the effectiveness of something.
Relevant to obesity and chronic disease, outcome measures may be measurable changes in health or health indicators, such as BMI, dietary intake, physical activity patterns or psychosocial indicators, such as health-related quality of life. Outcome measures may also refer to economic indicators, such as measuring the cost of delivering an intervention or service, or its cost per positive outcome – indicators of value-based healthcare. They may also be collected narratively (i.e. qualitative) – a research participant’s thoughts, attitudes and beliefs towards an aspect of your research are outcomes, and equally important in understanding the impact of your research impact.
Engaging with a Biostatistician from the early stages of research project development can help to set your project up for success. Biostatisticians can provide valuable advice and input across all stages of the research lifecycle, from concept development to writing a methodology, collecting data, analysing data and presenting data in simple, relatable and accurate ways.
QFAB Bioinformatics is Queensland’s core facility for providing support in bioinformatics, biostatistics and biodata to health researchers across Queensland and provides analysis, training and coaching services to researchers and clinicians. If you are a member of their partner institutions, you can access these services.
For clinicians or researchers more familiar with data analysis, Laerd Statistics provides easy-to-understand statistical guides on performing various statistical tests, including a “Statistical Test Calculator” for figuring out which statistical test you might need to use.
It’s a common story – trying to get new evidence or a new guideline into routine practice, but realising just how difficult, complex and challenging it is, and not always knowing if you were successful.
Translating research into practice means transforming our understanding of science and research into meaningful changes in clinical practice or health policy – it addresses the “know-do” gap. Research translation is known by many different names – knowledge translation, research into practice, diffusion, dissemination, knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) and knowledge implementation, as examples. The science of research translation is called implementation science.
Translating research into practice
The first step to effectively translating research into practice is you – the motivated clinician or researcher who has identified an evidence-based change in practice that needs to occur to improve the health and wellbeing of our population.
Queensland Health hosts a Translating Research into Practice (TRIP) online training program, delivered in partnership with AusHSI and Universities. TRIP training focuses on key aspects of successful research translation:
Identify a clinical problem
Evidence to support change
Planning for change
Evaluating the change
Getting your research out there
How to get published
The initial plan for publication must involve selecting an appropriate journal to submit to, as different journals will have different guidelines to follow when preparing a manuscript. When selecting a journal consider the following :
- Ensure your proposed paper fits within the scope of the journal
- Assess the credentials of the journal or publisher
- Browse the journal content published to assess quality and relevance to your field
- Check the website quality
- Source applicable tools and services offered to authors
- Follow the instructions for authors carefully
- Familiarising yourself with the aims and scope to ensure you are submitting to the most suitable journal.
- Understanding the costs and funding options.
- Preparing your manuscript in line with the formatting guidelines.
- Ensuring your manuscript is accurate and readable, accessing language-editing services where appropriate.
- Understanding the copyright agreement.
It is important to consider journal quality when planning to publish, identify journals relevant to your research and evaluate your overall publication metrics (please see research metrics outlined below). The following measures can be used to assess journal quality (ref):
|Impact Factor||A measure reflecting the annual average number of citations to recent articles published in that journal|
|Citescore||Citations received in the previous year from all documents published in the previous 3 years.|
|SNIP (Source Normalised Impact Per Paper)||Calculated by citations received in the year from articles, reviews and conference papers published in the previous 3 years.|
|SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)||Citations are weighted on the prestige of the issuing journal, calculated by citations received in the year from articles, reviews and conference papers published in the previous 3 years.|
|Eigenfactor||Citations from highly cited journals influence the score more than citations from lesser cited journals, calculated by citation received in the year from publications in the previous 5 years.|
Increasing the number of ways research findings reach key audiences increases the chances of uptake and action. A dissemination strategy should be planned as part of any implementation research, involving a context-sensitive strategy designed to disseminate particular research findings to specific audiences.
A dissemination strategy should include the following:
Partners / Influencers
Who will you engage to amplify your message?
What is the main message of your research findings and how will you frame it to resonate with your target audience?
What is the most effective ay to communicate your message to your target audience (e.g. social media, websites, conferences, traditional media, journals)?
Coverage and frequency
How many people are you trying to reach and how often do you want to communicate with them to achieve the required impact?
Potential risks and sensitivities
Considering different cultural and political perspectives, how will your dissemination be perceived by different groups?
Presenting your research
Conferences offer a great opportunity to develop your research career; providing a chance to network, learn about the latest research developments and understand the bigger picture in your respective field. Often you can begin to promote your work during the research phase at conferences . Presenting your paper at a conference can be a valuable way of raising your profile as a researcher and obtaining valuable feedback to improve your research .
How to write an abstract
An abstract is one well-developed paragraph that covers all the essential academic elements of a full-length paper, including the background, purpose, focus, methods, results and conclusion of the research project. An abstract should be coherent and concise, able to be read as a standalone piece of information. Consider the following tips when writing an abstract :
- First re-read your paper/report for an overview
- Condense each key section into 1-2 sentences, ensuring all major points are covered
- Check the word length and further reduce your words if necessary, by rewriting some sentences into a more succinct format
- If submitting an abstract for presentation at a relevant conference, ensure your abstract meets all requirements and guidelines outlined by the conference organising body
- Make final edits to promote flow and expression of your abstract
Research metrics – what do they mean?
Research metrics can provide evidence of influence or performance when applying for grants and promotions, quantify return on research investment when applying for grant renewals, highlight the research value in progress reports and identify who is using your published research(5). Examples include:
- Citations: the number of times that a journal article has appeared in the reference list of other articles and books 
- H-index: an author-level metric calculated from the count of citations to an author’s set of publications 
- i-10 index: number of publications with at least 10 citations 
- Altmetric Attention Score: an automatically calculated, weighted count of all the attention a research output has received online (as tracked by Altmetric) 
There are numerous social media platforms that can be utilised to promote your research. Check if researchers in your profession use a certain platform and focus your dissemination efforts there :
Twitter is used by many researchers and there are often discipline based hashtags that you can follow and use to promote your research. For additional help, the London School of Economics have created Using Twitter in university research, teaching and impact activities: a guide for academics and researchers.
LinkedIn provides another platform to connect with researchers in your profession.
WeChat is the most popular social media app in China, with increasing popularity internationally. Thisprovides another opportunity to connect with researchers and promote your work.
Research vs. Evaluation - what's the difference?
Research and evaluation are often talked about in similar contexts. They both use methods to gather data and answer a question. However, both are different disciplines including different focusses and practices. Some of the key differences include :
Produces generalisable knowledge
Judges merit or worth
Uses scientific inquiry
Includes the policy and program interests of stakeholders
Advances broad knowledge and theory
Provides information for decision making on a specific program
Involves a controlled setting
Is conducted within a range of settings
To be effective, evaluation of a service must be guided by a framework encompassing the following:
- A logic model containing; need, inputs, activities, outputs, short-term outcomes, medium-term outcomes,long-term outcomes.
- Evaluation questions including assumptions and external factors, linked to the logic model.
- A stakeholder map including upstream and downstream stakeholders.
- Criteria of merit including definitions and weighting.
- Evaluation map containing; the evaluation questions, criteria of merit, indicators, data sources and data collection methods.
Service evaluation seeks to assess how well a service is achieving its intended aims. It is undertaken to improve the quality of a healthcare service to maximise the benefit of the service users. Evaluation results are used mainly to inform local decision-making. Services need to consider the following questions to help direct their evaluations:
- How will we effectively measure the success and impact of our service?
- What data do we need to collect?
- How will we collect this data?
- Has this been done before in another service and what can we learn from them?
Although the actual outcome measures will differ depending on the location, target population, key health professionals involved and capacity of the service being delivered, below are some suggestions to consider:
Service level outcomes
Capacity and reach of service (child’s appointments booked per week/month, attrition rates, referral sources, treatment/management time frames per child/family, number of families who withdrew or self-discharged from the service, geographical spread of children/families who attended); service costs; accessibility of service; child/family satisfaction with service; health professionals opinions and perspectives of service.
Health related outcomes
Improved health literacy, increased self-efficacy and confidence to implement healthy changes relating to nutrition and physical activity, a reduction in obesogenic lifestyle behaviours, improvements in weight, a reduction in waist circumference and BMI, decreased blood lipid levels, decreased blood glucose levels and improved indicators of health-related quality of life.
Children and young people
Participating in research
- Make sure you have choice, flexibility and adaptability in your research design
- Tell the child/young person and caregiver how the research will benefit them
- Have clear strategies for disengaging in research, and make sure the child/young person and caregiver is aware of these.
- Allow extra time during the consultation – invest time in getting to know the child as an individual
- Promote shared responsibility between the child and caregiver – they are collaborators in their child’s health
Ethics and consent:
- Be clear about the line between protection and safety versus participation
- Explain clearly everything that is involved in participating in the study, including risks and inconveniences, before asking for consent.
- Ensure children and young people can provide consent to participate in their own way, that is in line with ethical standards
Interacting with the child or young person:
- Be clear, honest, realistic
- Keep it simple
- Listen to what you are being told by children
- Assess health literacy of parents/caregivers and children prior to educating them
- Use picture-enhanced materials
- Include young children in some conversations
- Promote active participation – skills training, storytelling and characters
- Encourage children to be involved in their own education intervention
- Give supportive and timely feedback
- Ask the child or young person if they have any questions or feedback, encouraging them to share their feelings.
Maori and Pacific Islander
To conduct research successfully among vulnerable cultural populations, projects must include the following :
- A mix of consultation and engagement with the community across conception, evaluation design, data collection, analysis, report writing and dissemination.
- Some form of needs and strengths assessment to understand the key issues in the community and the key enablers, barriers, supports and strengths that a good program would need to tap into or address in order to succeed.
- Conceptualisation and design work prior to commencement, including leading involvement from an individual with in-depth knowledge of and connections in the Pasifika community, with evaluation expertise.
The following framework has been designed by researchers in the field as an indication of key factors to address when conducting research with Maori and Pacific Islander cultural groups: Te Whetu Rehua: A Guide to Deciding Appropriate Activities for He Oranga Poutama from Developmental Evaluation Exemplars: Principles in Practice .
An example from the field
The Healthy Kids, Healthy Families project is a community-based, face-to-face and culturally tailored obesity prevention program, targeting Maori and Pacific Islander families living in Logan. This program is part of the Good Start Program, a state-wide preventative health program that provides support for the health and wellbeing of Maori and Pacific Islander children and families. It is an initiative that aims to lower the levels of chronic disease and obesity of families using culturally-tailored education sessions and resources.
Delivered over 8-weeks, the Healthy Kids, Healthy Families program focusses on building the knowledge, skills and confidence of healthy eating, physical activity and positive parenting practices. The program is not only delivered by Multicultural Health Coaches identifying with a Maori or Pacific Islander cultural background, but it was also designed using a unique co-design methodology. This approach promotes equity and inclusion of all stakeholders, acknowledges and caters for diversity and creates a medium for openness, respect and shared purpose.
The co-design phase followed an evidence-based framework, with the following factors contributing to successful program development:
- Community engagement – suitable and identified consumers were recruited through community events, social media and staff networks. Without the networks already established by the Good Start team, including family and friends, recruitment would not have been as successful. This aspect is key to the success of the project.
- Needs assessment – the needs assessment was informed by Maori and Pacific Islander determinants of health, cultural protocol and practices and our previous experiences in community engagement. Survey questions were developed considering cultural appropriateness, health literacy and sensitivity of the topic. This ensured the collection of honest and truthful responses from consumers.
- Situational analysis – analysis of responses regarding knowledge, attitude and practice relating to nutrition, physical activity, finance, culture, family and accessibility to services, identified priority areas for the prevention program to address. Results were presented back to consumers to ensure findings were an accurate representation of the community.
- Collaborative design – the program was designed drawing from the knowledge, experiences and expertise of community consumers, cultural advisors and health professionals, conducted by face-to-face “talanoa” (tala = to talk/noa = without concealment) which follows in the traditional oratory customs of the Maori and Pacific Islander culture. The co-design has contributed to the development of program objectives, session plans, resources and evaluation tools. The collaborative design ensures the program includes the promotion of cultural practices including talanoa, Fala, Salu, Basikete and Karakia, and the cultural tailoring of the program content including the Taro leaf.
- Quality improvement – feedback on the program was collected from all stakeholders involved in the program co-design, prior to full-scale implementation. Ongoing quality improvement is practiced every three months as part of the program, including both positive and constructive feedback from participants. This helps to ensure integrity of the program, adapting and responding to community needs through continuous co-design.
- Conducted over 1-year, the co-design phase required substantial dedication from the team, involving flexibility to work outside usual work hours. This dedication has been well worth the time investment, with the development of highly-culturally tailored program.
- Consumers must own the program from the beginning, with strong community empowerment pivotal to the ongoing success of the program to change health behaviours sustainably within this population for many years to come.
- High emphasis must be placed on shared decision-making, including the negotiation and coordination of beliefs from both health professionals and consumers.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Ethical research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities should:
- improve the way all researchers work with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their communities
- develop and/or strengthen research capabilities of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their communities
- enhance the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples as researchers, research partners, collaborators and participants in research 
What we know
Overweight and obesity is a contributing factor to chronic disease and contributes to the gap in life expectancy between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples . Childhood obesity is a significant public health concern leading to an increased risk of developing further chronic diseases later in life. In 2018, the Australian Research Alliance for Children & Youth (ARACY) estimated nationally childhood obesity affects 31.6% of young people (aged 5 – 24 years), however this figure is 40.1% for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people .
Engagement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healthcare workers in culturally based interventions is recommended, given that it is likely to improve receptivity and effectiveness of weight management interventions for children and their families  . A survey completed by 45 Qld Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers (2019) indicated that 91.1% agreed that addressing childhood overweight and obesity was an important part of their role. The study also identified inconsistencies between current clinical practice behaviours of Qld Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers in relation to screening and identification of paediatric overweight and obesity and current state guidelines.
The Making Tracks in Children’s Health (MaTCH) project, a partnership between Griffith University, Qld Child & Youth Clinical Network, Children’s Health Qld Hospital and Health Service and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community, aims to address the gap in childhood obesity service delivery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. This project has received funding through the 2018 Woolworths Nutrition-Related Health Services Delivery Grant and has been granted ethical approval through Children’s Health Queensland (HREC/18/QRCH/43015).
The project is being conducted in three phases under the advice of a Steering Committee with members of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workforce and community. Phase 3 is expected to be completed in 2020.
- Established a steering committee to provide overarching guidance and support to the research project to ensure cultural appropriateness with design and conduct. Membership included representatives from research, Queensland Health, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers, local Elder, key stakeholders and family/consumer representative.
- Conducted a scoping review of the evidence: Aim – To synthesise the literature on cultural adaptation of nutrition interventions aimed at improving health for First Peoples
- Aim – To consult key Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander stakeholders to support the co-design of the multidisciplinary health service to be culturally appropriate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children to treat childhood overweight/obesity.
- Developed and delivered a training package for research assistants (eg. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers, community members) to conduct consultations with the community.
- The aim of this training was to ensure facilitators are familiar with focus group methodology and to provide an overview of the ethics requirements.
- The training package was based on a review of the literature and was presented to the project team and steering committee for feedback.
- The training package included: a written training booklet, Powerpoint presentation and associated training materials (eg. Consent forms for participants) and consultation talking points (developed by the steering committee) which will guide consultations.
- Conducted a pilot training session.
- Conducting consultations using a multi-prong approach including community stakeholders, government and non-government health organisations/service providers. Examples may include community groups, local Elders, individuals, past service users, mums and bubs groups, school parents, health service providers and health workers.
Health Service Delivery Testing
- Aim – To evaluate the delivery (i.e. feasibility, preliminary efficacy and cost-effectiveness) of the redeveloped culturally appropriate health service for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children to treat childhood overweight/obesity.
- Aim for 6-month service implementation.
- Evaluation will be quantitative and qualitative.
- The co-design process with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community requires substantial time investment but this investment is crucial to establishing rapport and relationships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander stakeholders. Initially this might include local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health professionals, local Elders, key community groups, service providers and families.
- Preparation is key to conducting consultation. It’s important for research assistants to plan how they will run the session and how to adapt the consultation talking points to suit their own wording as well as for the type of consultation participants (eg. asking caregivers vs asking Elders).
- ACT Government. Research ethics and governance Canberra: ACT Government; 2019 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: https://health.act.gov.au/research/research-ethics-and-governance/consent.
- The University of Queensland. Analyse and display data Brsibane: The University of Queensland,; 2019 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: https://web.library.uq.edu.au/node/4128/4.
- BMJ Publishing Group. How to choose a jounal London: BMJ Publishing Group,; 2018 [cited October 2019]. Available from: https://authors.bmj.com/before-you-submit/how-to-choose-a-journal/.
- Springer Nature. BMC Research Notes London2019 [cited October 2019]. Available from: https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines.
- The University of Queensland. Metrics, engagement and impact Brisbane: The University of Queensland,; 2019. Available from: https://web.library.uq.edu.au/node/4654/2.
- World Health Organisation. Disseminating research findings Geneva: World Health Organisation,; 2014 [October 2019]. Available from: http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/year/2014/participant- workbook5_030414.pdf.
- The University of Queensland. Strategic scholarly publishing Brisbane: The University of Queensland,; 2019 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: https://web.library.uq.edu.au/node/3965/4#4.
- Taylor&Francis Informa Group Ltd. Academic Conference Tips London: Taylor&Francis Informa Group Ltd,; 2019 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/academic-conference-tips/.
- The University of Adelaide. Writing an Abstract Adelaide: The University of Adelaide,; 2014 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: https://www.adelaide.edu.au/writingcentre/sites/default/files/docs/learningguide-writinganabstract.pdf.
- Creative Commons. Creative Commons Toolkit Indianapolis, USA: Creative Commons 2019 [cited 2019]. Available from: https://www.metrics-toolkit.org/citations-articles/.
- The University of Queensland. Calculate your h-index Brisbane: The University of Queensland,; 2019 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: https://guides.library.uq.edu.au/for-researchers/h-index.
- Creative Commons. Altmetric Attention Score Indianapolis, USA2019 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: https://www.metrics-toolkit.org/altmetric-attention-score/.
- Duddy J. What is the difference between research and evaluation? Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research,; 2019 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: http://www.reachprogramscience.ca/what-is-the-difference-between-research-and-evaluation/.
- Saxby N, Collins C, Littlewood R, O’Sullivan T, Kinghorn V. Empowering children in clinical and research settings – a workshop. Dietitians Association of Australia National Conference 2019,; Gold Coast, Australia2019.
- ARACY, NSW Commission Children and Young People. Involving children and young people in research In: ARACY and NSW Commission Children and Young People, editor.: ARACY and NSW Commission Children and Young People,; 2008.
- Wehipeihana N, Davidson E, McKegg K, Shanker V. What Does it Take to do Evaluation in Communities and Cultural Contexts Other Than Our Own? J MultiDisciplinary Evaluation. 2010 2010;6(13):182-92.
- Patton M, McKegg K, Wehipeihana N, editors. Developmental Evaluation Exemplars; Principles in Practice. London: Guilford Press; 2015.
- NHMRC. Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and communities: guidelines for researchers and stakeholders. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2018.
- Vos T, Barker B, Begg S, Stanley L, Lopez A. Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples: the Indigenous health gap. International j of epidemiology. 2008 12/01;38:470-7.
- ARACY. Report Card 2018: the Wellbeing of young Australians 2018. ARACY, 2018.
- Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Amerrican J Public Health. 2010;100 (S1).
- McCalman J, Heyeres M, Campbell S, Bainbridge R, Chamberlain C, Strobel N, et al. Family-centred interventions by primary healthcare services for Indigenous early childhood wellbeing in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States: a systematic scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(71).
- QCAA. Yarning Circles Brisbane: QCAA; 2018 [cited Dec 2019]. Available from: https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/about/k-12-policies/aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-perspectives/resources/yarning-circles.
- Laycock A, Walker D, Harrison N, Brands J. Researching indigenous health: a practical guide for researchers. Melbourne: The Lowitja Institute, 2011 Dec 2019. Report No.
- Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity. American J of Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S40-S6. PubMed PMID: 20147663.
Last updated 19 May 2020